Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778353›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Deep brain stimulation in globus pallidus internus travels to thalamus and subthalamic nuclei along physiological pathways.

Maral Kasiri, Jessica Vidmark, Estefania Hernandez-Martin, S Alireza Seyyed Mousavi, Terence D Sanger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maral KasiriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Jessica VidmarkDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Estefania Hernandez-MartinDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
S Alireza Seyyed MousaviDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Terence D SangerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neuromodulation method for treatment of various neurological disorders. Research on DBS has often focused on local inhibition or excitation effects, at the site of stimulation. However, it is well-known that DBS can lead to robust evoked potentials (EP) not only at the stimulation site, representing the local effect, but also in distant brain regions, representing the effects on distant targets. While the significance of these EPs for therapeutic outcomes is not known, it appears that the electrical effects of DBS have a partial modulatory impact on downstream targets. Nonetheless, it partly remains unclear through what mechanism DBS pulses travel to the distant targets or what portion of the pulses travel along the normal pathways from the stimulation site. The possible scenarios include orthodromic or antidromic pathways, accessory pathways, normally inhibited pathways, and direct electromagnetic activation of distant sites. We hypothesize that the pathways that transmit DBS pulses include the pathways that transmit intrinsic neural signals. Methods: To test this, we performed a transfer function analysis on deep brain recordings from children with dystonia, during DBS-off condition and compared its impulse response with the transmission of signals from electrical stimulation during DBS-on condition. We compared impulse responses derived from intrinsic neural signals during voluntary movement (DBS-off) to evoked potentials (EPs) recorded during electrical stimulation (DBS-on), focusing on directional transmission (orthodromic vs. antidromic). Results: DBS EPs were more accurately predicted by impulse responses corresponding to direct axonal activation rather than somatic relay. Significant correlations between intrinsic signal transfer functions and EPs, particularly in orthodromic directions ( Discussion: These results suggest that DBS engages existing motor pathways to reach distant targets, offering mechanistic insight into its network effects. This supports future approaches that could tailor treatment plans based on individual connectivity maps to improve clinical efficacy of DBS.

Indexed as

DBS mechanismdeep brain stimulationempirical transfer functionmovement disordersignal transmission

Identifiers

PMID40778353
PMCPMC12328292

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.