Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778361›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Integration of Immunometabolic Composite Indices and Machine Learning for Diabetic Retinopathy Risk Stratification: Insights from NHANES 2011 - 2020.

Cui Xuehao, Wen Dejia, Li Xiaorong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cui XuehaoJohn Van Geest Centre for Brain Repair and MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Wen DejiaEye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Li XiaorongEye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association between immunometabolic composite indices and diabetic retinopathy (DR) and to develop predictive models using machine learning (ML) techniques to improve early detection and risk stratification for DR. Design: A cross-sectional study. Subjects and Controls: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2020 were analyzed, involving 8249 participants categorized into healthy controls (n = 6830), diabetes without retinopathy (n = 918), and DR (n = 501). Methods: Immunometabolic indices reflecting insulin resistance, inflammation, and lipid metabolism were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression models assessed associations with DR, and Bayesian kernel machine regression analyzed nonlinear interactions. Eight ML models, including ensemble methods, were developed to predict DR risk, with feature importance determined by SHapley Additive exPlanations. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was DR status, classified according to the ETDRS criteria from fundus photography. Results: Key immunometabolic indices, notably Frailty Index (FRAILTY) and fasting serum insulin (FSI), were significantly associated with increased DR risk, whereas the metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS) showed a protective effect. Bayesian kernel machine regression highlighted complex interactions among indices. Machine learning models achieved high predictive accuracy, particularly XGBoost and LightGBM (area under the curve > 0.9). SHapley Additive exPlanations analyses identified FRAILTY, FSI, and METS as the most influential predictors. Conclusions: Immunometabolic dysregulation significantly contributes to DR progression beyond traditional risk factors such as hyperglycemia alone. Incorporating immunometabolic indices into predictive models substantially enhances DR risk stratification, facilitating personalized screening and intervention strategies. Machine learning approaches effectively identify high-risk individuals, underscoring their utility in clinical practice for early DR detection and targeted preventive care. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

Bayesian kernel machine regressionDiabetic retinopathyImmunometabolic indicesNHANESRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID40778361
PMCPMC12329596

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.