Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778369›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Women's health facility choices for antenatal, delivery, and postnatal care in Eastern Visayas, Philippines.

Ahreum Choi, Heunghee Kim, Sherlyn Mae P Provido, Hee Sun Kim, Romil Jeffrey Juson, Diana Lucas, Heyeon Ji, Jihwan Jeon, Yunhee Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahreum ChoiDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Heunghee KimResearch Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sherlyn Mae P ProvidoResearch Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hee Sun KimResearch Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Romil Jeffrey JusonKOICA MNCH Project, World Vision Philippines, Tacloban City, Philippines.
Diana LucasKOICA MNCH Project, World Vision Philippines, Tacloban City, Philippines.
Heyeon JiInternational Ministry Division, World Vision Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jihwan JeonInternational Ministry Division, World Vision Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yunhee KangCenter for Human Nutrition, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aims to identify socioeconomic factors associated with the choice of antenatal care (ANC) facilities and to analyze trends in the utilization of health facilities for delivery and postnatal care (PNC) based on the type of ANC facility in Eastern Visayas, Philippines. Methods: This secondary data analysis uses baseline and one-year follow-up survey data from a quasi-experimental study conducted in September 2023 and 2024. Data from 1,414 women with information on maternal health facility utilization was analyzed. ANC facilities were categorized into four groups: Barangay Health Station (BHS), Rural Health Unit (RHU), hospital/clinic and others. Multinomial logistic regressions were applied, adjusting for socio-economic status and Barangay location, to examine associations between socio-economic factors and ANC facility choice, as well as trends in delivery and PNC facility utilization based on ANC facility type. Results: Among 1,414 postpartum mothers, 35.6% received ANC at BHS, 34.1% at RHU, 32.7% at hospital/clinic, and 0.6% did not receive ANC. Most deliveries (83.3%) and PNC (61.4%) services occurred in hospital/clinic settings. Mothers who received ANC at a hospital/clinic were more likely to have higher education (aRRR = 7.04, 95% CI: 3.97, 12.50) and be wealthier (aRRR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.09, 3.69) compared to those who received ANC at BHS. Mothers receiving ANC at RHU (aRRR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.79) or hospital/clinic (aRRR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.78) were less likely to be single with a partner compared to those receiving ANC at BHS. Mothers who received ANC at hospital/clinic were more likely to deliver at a hospital/clinic (aRRR = 8.49, 95% CI: 3.56, 20.26) than at a RHU/BHS, and to receive PNC at a hospital/clinic (aRRR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.32, 3.24) instead of at a BHS, compared to those receiving ANC at BHS. Mothers receiving ANC at RHU were more likely to also receive PNC at an RHU (aRRR = 16.13, 95% CI: 7.80, 33.36) compared to those receiving ANC at BHS. Conclusions: Socioeconomic disparities are associated with ANC facility choice, which in turn affects subsequent decisions regarding facilities for delivery and PNC in Eastern Visayas. As such, facility selection should be guided by healthcare needs rather than socioeconomic status.

Indexed as

antenatal caredeliverymaternal health care facilitymaternal health care utilizationPhilippinespostnatal care

Identifiers

PMID40778369
PMCPMC12328284

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.