ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025
Emergency cancer diagnosis in Paris: A cross-sectional study using AP-HP data.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emergency cancer diagnosis in Paris: A cross-sectional study using AP-HP data.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many cancer patients are diagnosed following an emergency hospital admission in the 30 days preceding their diagnosis ('emergency presentation') and these patients have worse outcomes. Despite multiple international studies, there is only sparse evidence on emergency diagnosis of cancer in France. We examined the frequency of emergency presentation and its association with survival in patients with breast, lung, colon, rectal and pancreatic cancer, using data from the Paris Region University Hospitals (Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, AP-HP). Between January 2019 and June 2022, 25,845 patients were newly referred with a relevant cancer, of whom 3960 (15.3%) were emergency presentations (23% for pancreatic, 20% for colon, 19% for lung, 9% for rectal and 6% for breast cancer). Emergency presenters were more likely to have metastatic cancer, less likely to have surgical treatment (except for colon cancer patients), and more likely to die within a year from diagnosis. The risk of emergency presentation increased with age and was higher for lung and pancreatic cancer. Emergency presentation rates for lung cancer were highest in the first Covid-19 pandemic year (2020). Emergency presentation was strongly associated with worse survival compared with non-emergency presentation (HR 2.67, 95% CI 2.52-2.84), even after adjustment for metastatic status. Emergency presentation is a common route to diagnosis in AP-HP and can be identified from routine datasets. Efforts to reduce diagnosis as an emergency may help improve cancer outcomes, justifying public health and health system initiatives supporting prompt presentation and diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.