ArticlePediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2025
Eight PICU Follow-Up Programs in the United States Established From 2013 to 2022: Report From the Pediatric Outcomes Studies After PICU (POST-PICU) Investigators.
Article in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Care Pathway and Outcomes in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Narrative Review from Emergency Department Recognition to PICU Management.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pediatric Intensive Care Core Outcomes-a modified Delphi consensus process (PIC-CO).Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Diagnosis and management of Children with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in Paediatrics: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the French National Authority for Health (HAS).Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesChildren surviving critical illness are at risk for new morbidities collectively termed "post-intensive care syndrome-pediatrics" (PICS-p). Because PICU teams are familiar with PICS-p and motivated to improve patient outcomes, intensivists are ideally positioned to improve access to PICU follow-up care. We aimed to describe various models of care developed by existing U.S. PICU follow-up programs.
designThe Pediatric Outcomes Studies after PICU (POST-PICU) subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators network convened a virtual meeting with presentations and discussion by 11 leaders of eight follow-up programs, structured using input from the 125 POST-PICU members including advance questions.
settingNinety-minute virtual meeting, September 2024. We recorded and transcribed the presentations and discussion to draft this report. PANEL PROCEEDINGS: Each leader presented their program and participated in discussion, organized into three domains based on the provided questions: 1) the program's target population and interventions; 2) program administration and funding; and 3) program outcomes. Each program aimed to identify patients considered at-risk for physiologic, neurologic, and/or psychologic PICU sequelae and to provide screening, referral to supportive or specialist services as indicated, and collaboration with their existing healthcare teams. Funding influenced program structure and processes. Many programs provided clinical services alongside services tied to research efforts. Tracking program outcomes helped programs advocate for long-term funding and institutional support. Panelists described their programs as providing "wraparound care," "transition care," and "connection"-supporting patients and families through different stages of the PICU and hospital stay, rehabilitation, and transition to home care.
conclusionsThis information can support PICU teams in developing infrastructure to provide clinically indicated education, screening, and support for their patients, as the PICU community engages in further research and advocacy to improve access to PICU follow-up care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.