Evidence mapPaperPMID 40778813Full record

ArticlePediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2025

Eight PICU Follow-Up Programs in the United States Established From 2013 to 2022: Report From the Pediatric Outcomes Studies After PICU (POST-PICU) Investigators.

Leslie A Dervan, Mary Hartman, Ericka L Fink, Julie C Fitzgerald, Trevor A Hall, Krista Laux, Lindsey A Morgan, Sarah Murphy, Neethi P Pinto, Elisabeth Schrock and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Leslie A DervanDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-4521-354
Mary HartmanDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Ericka L FinkDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Julie C FitzgeraldDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Trevor A HallDivision of Pediatric Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Krista LauxBehavioral Science Division, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Lindsey A MorganDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Sarah MurphyPediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Neethi P PintoDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Elisabeth SchrockDepartment of Social Work, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jane E WhitneyDivision of Medical Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Cydni N WilliamsDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Elizabeth Y KillienDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Pediatric Outcomes Studies After PICU (POST-PICU) Investigators Subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators Network

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL150229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesChildren surviving critical illness are at risk for new morbidities collectively termed "post-intensive care syndrome-pediatrics" (PICS-p). Because PICU teams are familiar with PICS-p and motivated to improve patient outcomes, intensivists are ideally positioned to improve access to PICU follow-up care. We aimed to describe various models of care developed by existing U.S. PICU follow-up programs.

designThe Pediatric Outcomes Studies after PICU (POST-PICU) subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators network convened a virtual meeting with presentations and discussion by 11 leaders of eight follow-up programs, structured using input from the 125 POST-PICU members including advance questions.

settingNinety-minute virtual meeting, September 2024. We recorded and transcribed the presentations and discussion to draft this report. PANEL PROCEEDINGS: Each leader presented their program and participated in discussion, organized into three domains based on the provided questions: 1) the program's target population and interventions; 2) program administration and funding; and 3) program outcomes. Each program aimed to identify patients considered at-risk for physiologic, neurologic, and/or psychologic PICU sequelae and to provide screening, referral to supportive or specialist services as indicated, and collaboration with their existing healthcare teams. Funding influenced program structure and processes. Many programs provided clinical services alongside services tied to research efforts. Tracking program outcomes helped programs advocate for long-term funding and institutional support. Panelists described their programs as providing "wraparound care," "transition care," and "connection"-supporting patients and families through different stages of the PICU and hospital stay, rehabilitation, and transition to home care.

conclusionsThis information can support PICU teams in developing infrastructure to provide clinically indicated education, screening, and support for their patients, as the PICU community engages in further research and advocacy to improve access to PICU follow-up care.

Indexed as

AftercareCritical CareCritical IllnessIntensive Care Units, PediatricChildFollow-Up StudiesHumansUnited Statesaftercarecritical care/psychologycritical illness/psychologypediatric intensive care unitspost-intensive care syndromesurvivors/psychology

Identifiers

PMID40778813
PMCPMC13034734

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.