SynthesisCurrent nutrition reports2025
Cancer Risk and Mortality Following Substitution of Animal Foods with Plant Foods: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Current nutrition reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Long-Term Dietary Changes and Mortality among Participants of a Whole Food Plant-Based Pilot Study for Metastatic Breast Cancer.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of the reviewThis systematic review aims to evaluate the evidence on replacing animal foods (eggs, red meat, processed meat, poultry, fish, and dairy products) with plant foods (fruits, vegetables, nuts, whole grains, soy, and non-soy legumes) regarding cancer risk, cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality. RECENT
findingsA systematic search was done using PubMed and Web of Science, adhering to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that substituted animal foods or animal protein with plant foods or plant protein were considered. The ROBINS-E tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A total of 17 articles were included, thereof 14 cohort studies, one case-cohort study, and two pooled analyses of cohort studies. Replacing animal foods or animal protein with plant foods or plant protein was associated with a reduced cancer risk in six studies (two studies on colorectal cancer, one on rectal cancer, and three on breast cancer), whereas four studies found no associations (one each for liver, bladder, colon and total cancer). The substitution of animal foods or animal protein with plant foods or plant protein was associated with a lower risk of cancer mortality and total mortality in three and five studies, respectively. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to the high heterogeneity of the studies. Substituting animal foods with plant foods may contribute to reducing the risk of breast and colorectal cancer, cancer mortality, and total mortality. Future studies should assess the effect of this substitution on other cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40779285What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.