Trial reportPloS one2025
Effect of individualized PEEP on lung ultrasound score and optic nerve sheath diameter in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePositive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is widely used during surgery, but its effects on lung and brain protection remain debated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of individualized PEEP on lung ultrasound score (LUS) and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.
methodsForty-six patients aged 60-79 years undergoing laparoscopic rectal tumour resection between June 2022 and December 2022 were randomized into two groups: Group E (individualized PEEP guided by driving pressure) and Group C (control group, PEEP = 5 cm H2O). LUS was assessed 30 minutes postoperatively. ONSD was measured at 5 minutes before anesthesia induction (T0), 5 minutes after tracheal tube insertion (T1), 5 and 60 minutes after Trendelenburg positioning (T2, T3), and 30 minutes postoperatively (T4). Arterial oxygen index (OI) and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) were recorded post-intubation and pre-extubation. Postoperative pulmonary and neurological complications were followed up.
resultsPostoperative LUS was significantly lower in Group E than in Group C (P < 0.05). OI was significantly higher in Group E before extubation (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in ONSD between groups. Within each group, ONSD values at T2 and T3 were significantly higher than those at T0 (P < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups.
conclusionsDuring laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer, individualized PEEP reduces LUS scores, improves oxygenation, and does not increase ONSD values compared to fixed PEEP.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200060434.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.