Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40779585›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Teaching fish new tricks: Repeated exposure to a velocity barrier improves passage performance.

Rachel Mb Crawford, Eleanor M Gee, Brendan J Hicks, Katherine A Corn, Paul A Franklin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel Mb CrawfordSchool of Science, Environmental Research Institute, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2357-2901
Eleanor M GeeNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Brendan J HicksSchool of Science, Environmental Research Institute, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-0945
Katherine A CornSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Paul A FranklinNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7800-7259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instream structures like culverts and dams can impede upstream fish migration, acting as environmental filters that only allow onward migration of individuals that can successfully pass them. Cognition and learning ability may be an important factor in determining if a fish can successfully traverse such structures. This study investigated the effect of repeated exposure on passage performance of juvenile Galaxias maculatus through an experimental raceway. Over five consecutive days, individual fish were subjected to the same high-speed (0.45-0.5 m s-1) conditions within the raceway, and performance on each day was recorded. The proportion of fish successfully passing the barrier increased significantly from 40% on Day 1-63% on Day 5. Time-to-event analysis further revealed that by Day 5, fish successfully passed the barrier at a significantly faster rate compared to Day 1. However, repeated exposure did not significantly improve approach or entry rates into the raceway. Fish length influenced approach rates, but not entry or passage rates. These findings suggest that cognition and spatial memory play a role in improving passage performance through velocity barriers, but other factors such as attraction flows may also play an important role in successful passage outcomes.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationFishesAnimalsCognitionLearning

Identifiers

PMID40779585
PMCPMC12334001

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.