ReviewJournal of neurointerventional surgery2026
Endovascular management of tandem occlusions: current evidence and future directions.
Review in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of procedural sedation requirements during endovascular treatment for acute anterior circulation ischaemic stroke: a post-hoc analysis of the INDIVIDUATE trial.European stroke journal · 2026Trial
- Emergency carotid artery stenting during endovascular treatment of tandem lesions in acute ischemic stroke: a single-center retrospective study.CVIR endovascular · 2026Article
- Revisiting Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Carotid Tandem Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Railroad Technique: A Mechanical Thrombectomy Approach Using Serial Deployment of Two Stent Retrievers for Tandem ICA-M1 Embolic Occlusion.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tandem occlusions (TOs)-concurrent extracranial large artery steno-occlusion and intracranial artery occlusion-represent a challenging clinical predicament. Stroke due to TOs is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Because of increased clot burden compared with single occlusions and impaired anterograde flow, intravenous thrombolysis may be less effective, and outcomes are poor without timely intervention. Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has become the cornerstone of intracranial revascularization, but the optimal management of the extracranial carotid lesion remains undefined. Evidence from observational studies and early-phase randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is mixed. Currently, no standardized treatment approach is widely accepted, and practice patterns are guided by personal preference and expert opinion. Ongoing RCTs seek to determine whether there is an optimal approach to EVT in the setting of TO with respect to (a) technique and (b) the order of treatment. Even on completion of active RCTs, a dearth of evidence will remain on the optimal antithrombotic therapy, exact device selection, and EVT in dissection-associated TOs and posterior circulation TOs. In the present narrative review, we critically appraise the literature on the endovascular management of TOs and offer considerations for practice that may help to reduce the burden of tandem occlusion strokes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.