Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40780835›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2025

Preferences of women for maternal healthcare services in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.

Daniel Gashaneh Belay, Gizachew A Tessema, Melaku Birhanu Alemu, Bereket Kefale, Jennifer Dunne, Richard Norman

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel Gashaneh BelayCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia danielgashaneh28@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5724-6234
Gizachew A TessemaCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4784-8151
Melaku Birhanu AlemuCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1768-6689
Bereket KefaleCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1795-9886
Jennifer DunneDementia Centre of Excellence, enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Richard NormanCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal healthcare service utilisation during pregnancy, childbirth and the subsequent postpartum periods could improve the health outcomes of women and newborns. However, women in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) have a lower uptake of these services, which is partly attributed to a lack of access to preferred maternal health services. This study systematically synthesised evidence on women's preferences for maternal healthcare services in LMICs.

methodsA systematic search was undertaken from PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus and Global Health databases, and supplemented with Google Scholar for grey literature. We have included published articles from 1 January 2000 to the date of the last search, 14 July 2023. Studies were included if they reported preferences of women for maternal health services in LMICs using the stated preference analysis methods. The quality of the included papers was assessed using the conjoint analysis applications in the healthcare checklist. We have thematically presented the attributes using a healthcare access framework (accessibility, availability, accommodation, affordability and acceptability). The first two most important and least important attributes in each study were identified based on the relative importance scores.

findingsOf the 54 articles identified for full-text review, 15 studies from eight LMICs met the inclusion criteria for the final review. Attributes related to the acceptability of healthcare services, such as a provider's good attitude and rapport (47.1%), and the availability of services, such as medications and supplies (41.2%), were typically considered the most important by women. Conversely, accessibility attributes, such as increased distance or travel time to health facilities (29.4%), and affordability attributes, such as increased cost of services (23.5%), were generally less valued by women. INTERPRETATIONS: The acceptability and availability attributes of healthcare services were considered the most important by women. Aligning maternal healthcare service provision with women's preferences can promote person-centred care, leading to increased service uptake. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023444415.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesMaternal Health ServicesPatient PreferenceChoice BehaviorFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyGlobal HealthHealth policies and all other topicsHealth services researchMaternal healthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40780835
PMCPMC12336509

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.