Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40781276›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Opportunities for optimising care transitions of adults with multiple long-term conditions: a qualitative interview study.

Stella Arakelyan, Atul Anand, Stewart W Mercer, Nazir Lone, Marcus J Lyall, Julie A Jacko, Bruce Guthrie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exploring Patient and Caregiver Work and Continuity of Care During Hospital-to-Home Transitions of Care in the Canadian Context.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stella ArakelyanAdvanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. stella.arakelyan@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0326-707X
Atul AnandNHS Lothian, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Stewart W MercerAdvanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Nazir LoneNHS Lothian, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Marcus J LyallNHS Lothian, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Julie A JackoCentre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Bruce GuthrieAdvanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR202639National Institute for Health and Care Research/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council NIHR157712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of adults with multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) who experience frequent care transitions is rising. Improving care transitions for adults MLTC is important because transitions between and within care settings commonly lead to preventable adverse events. We explored multidisciplinary professional perspectives and experiences of managing care transitions for patients with MLTC to identify opportunities for improvement.

methodsQualitative interviews with 30 health and social care professionals in four Scottish integrated Health and Social Care Partnerships. Data were collected between May 2023 and March 2024. Thematic analysis was used, guided by the Sustainable Integrated Chronic Care Models for Multimorbidity: Delivery, Financing, and Performance (SELFIE) framework.

resultsCare transitions were described as lacking person-centredness and consistency. Variability in decisions on cross-boundary acute care pathways was largely attributed to human factors (e.g., ease of arranging referrals, a lack of trust or awareness of Hospital at Home service) by hospital specialist staff, but to clinical complexity and home environment limitations (physical and social) by community staff. Ineffective interprofessional relationships and poor communication across services were common experiences, significantly driven by a lack of integration between IT systems affecting timely access to information and by services having different priorities and pressures. Workforce shortages, knowledge gaps in managing MLTC, and long-standing capacity issues in social care were identified as important barriers to effectively managing transitions.

conclusionsWe identified multiple system-level barriers to providing high-quality and safe care transitions. We proposed key improvement opportunities, highlighting the need for using system engineering and systems thinking approaches, underpinned by the active engagement of patients, carers, professionals, and wider stakeholders to drive meaningful and sustainable change in transitions of care.

Indexed as

Multiple Chronic ConditionsAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMultimorbidityQualitative ResearchScotlandCare coordinationIntegrated careMultimorbidityQuality of careTransitions of care

Identifiers

PMID40781276
PMCPMC12333269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.