ArticleMedical physics2025
Deformable image registration of dark-field chest radiographs for functional lung assessment.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comorbidity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary tuberculosis: a bibliometric analysis (2011-2025) with narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Deformable image registration of dark-field chest radiographs for functional lung assessment.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDark-field radiography of the human chest has been demonstrated to have promising potential for the analysis of the lung microstructure and the diagnosis of respiratory diseases. However, most previous studies of dark-field chest radiographs evaluated the lung signal only in the inspiratory breathing state. PURPOSE: Our work aims to add a new perspective to these previous assessments by locally comparing dark-field lung information between different respiratory states to explore new ways of functional lung imaging based on dark-field chest radiography.
methodsWe use suitable deformable image registration methods for dark-field chest radiographs to establish a mapping of lung areas in distinct breathing states. After registration, we utilize an inter-frame ratio approach to examine the local dark-field signal changes and evaluate the gradient of the craniocaudal axis projections and mean lung field values to draw a quantitative comparison to standard chest radiographs and assess the relationship with the respiratory capacity.
resultsConsidering full inspiration and expiration scans from a clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease study, the registration framework allows to establish an accurate spatial correspondence (Median Dice score 0.95/0.94, mean surface distance 3.71/3.52 mm, and target registration error 6.10 mm) between dark-field chest radiographs in different respiratory states and thus to perform a local signal change analysis. Compared to the utilization of standard chest radiographs, the presented approach benefits from the absence of bone and soft-tissue structures in the dark-field images, which move differently during respiration than the lung tissue. Our quantitative evaluation of the inter-frame ratios demonstrates evidence of craniocaudal gradient-sensitivity advantages concerning the relative vital lung capacity of the study participants in the dark-field images (Spearman correlation coefficients:
conclusionsOur regional characterization of lung dark-field signal changes between the breathing states via deformable image registration provides a proof-of-principle that dynamic radiography-based lung function assessment approaches may benefit from considering registered dark-field images in addition to standard plain chest radiographs. This opens up new options for low-dose and rapid lung ventilation assessment via dark-field chest radiography that has the potential to improve lung diagnostics considerably.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.