ArticleClinical rheumatology2025
A cross-sectional survey on VEXAS syndrome: insights from a global expert panel.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disease-specific biomarker value of C-reactive protein and its composite indices in autoinflammatory diseases: an integrated study of multi-modal omics and population cohorts.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- The First Reported Case of VEXAS Syndrome in Lebanon: Efficacy of Azacitidine as a Therapeutic Option-Case Report.Case reports in hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVacuolization, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome is recently described, for which the diagnosis and management lack official guidelines.
aimsTo assess the diagnostic capabilities and disease management of VEXAS syndrome among physicians in the global context.
methodsAn electronic survey was sent to clinicians with expertise in VEXAS syndrome between January and February 2025 to gather real-life data on the management of VEXAS.
resultsSeventy-four clinicians completed the survey from Europe (n = 51, 68.9%), North America (n = 9, 12.2%), Australasia (n = 6, 8.1%), Asia (n = 6, 8.1%), Africa (n = 1, 1.4%), and South America (n = 1, 1.4%), mostly being hematologists (n = 24, 32.4%) and rheumatologists (n = 24, 32.4%). Majority of the clinicians were managing between 1 and 4 (n = 40, 54.1%) and 5 and 9 patients (n = 17, 23%) with VEXAS syndrome, with regular clinic review, typically under 7-weekly intervals (n = 44, 59.5%). UBA1 mutation testing was available for 76% of physicians and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the entire gene was most common (n = 24, 32.9%) with a turnaround time within 12 weeks. C-reactive protein (CRP) was selected by over half of the clinicians (n = 35, 55.4%) as a marker of disease relapse. Treatment with corticosteroids at 1 mg/kg (n = 48, 64.9%) was the most common initial dosing and upfront systemic immunomodulatory treatment was added by more than half of clinicians (n = 39, 52.7%). The most frequent treatments of choice (n = 66) were Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) and IL-6 targeted monoclonal antibodies (both n = 21, 31.8%). Azacitidine was mostly used in patients with concomitant myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (69.9%). Only 29.6% indicated that allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) had been successfully completed in their department.
conclusionsThis is the first clinician survey on VEXAS syndrome, encompassing a global representation of multiple specialties on current disease management, highlighting several unmet needs (longitudinal follow-up, lack of on-label drugs, financial toxicity) actionable for future research. Keypoints • Globally, VEXAS syndrome is being increasingly recognized, and this survey demonstrates real-life physician practices. • The survey identified both hematologists and rheumatologists as the main care providers, amongst other specialties, identifying the need for a multidisciplinary approach in managing patients with VEXAS syndrome. • Diagnostic UBA1 testing was available for more than 75% clinicians with turnaround time < 12 weeks and C-reactive protein was selected as a useful marker of disease relapse. • Treatment modalities were heterogeneous, identifying the need for consensus guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.