ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2025
Predictors of Glaucoma Conversion in an African Ancestry Cohort: A Longitudinal Study.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformer Models, Graph Networks, and Generative AI in Gut Microbiome Research: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The influence of intraocular pressure in the onset and progression of myopia in children and adolescents: a review of mechanisms and clinical significance.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo identify risk factors associated with conversion from glaucoma suspect to primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in individuals of African ancestry.
designProspective case-control study. SUBJECTS: A total of 330 glaucoma suspects from the Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics study with a median follow-up of 6.71 (IQR: 3.73-9.72) years. Participants were recruited from ophthalmology clinics in Philadelphia between July 2010 and August 2024.
methodsParticipants were classified as glaucoma suspects using quantitative adaptations of the American Academy of Ophthalmology definition if they met at least one of the following criteria: (1) elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), (2) suspicious optic nerve head or retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) appearance, or (3) suspicious visual field results. POAG was defined as the development of characteristic glaucomatous optic nerve damage with corresponding visual field defects. Demographic, clinical, and ocular parameters were measured at baseline and during follow-up examinations.
main outcome measuresConversion from glaucoma suspect to POAG. Risk factors were assessed using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.
resultsDuring the follow-up period, 45 (13.6%) out of 330 glaucoma suspects converted to POAG cases. In multivariate analysis, 3 factors were significantly associated with increased risk of POAG conversion: elevated IOP (≥21 mmHg) (HR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.20-5.17; P = .01), absence of hypertension (HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.18-4.85; P = .02), and presence of myopia (≤-0.5D) (HR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.08-5.14; P = .03). Univariate analysis revealed associations between RNFL characteristics and conversion risk, including greater inter-eye difference in RNFL thickness.
conclusionsIn glaucoma suspects of African ancestry, higher risk of POAG conversion is independently associated with higher IOP, absence of hypertension, and presence of myopia. These findings can inform targeted screening and management strategies for this high-risk population. The unexpected association between absence of hypertension and increased conversion risk warrants further investigation into the complex relationship between systemic blood pressure and glaucoma pathogenesis in individuals of African ancestry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.