Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40783949›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Community Engagement in Long Covid Research: Process, Evaluation and Recommendations From the Long COVID and Episodic Disability Study.

Margaret E O'Hara, Kiera McDuff, Hannah Wei, Lisa McCorkell, Catherine Thomson, Mary Kelly, Susie Goulding, Imelda O'Donovan, Sarah O'Connell, Ruth Stokes and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Margaret E O'HaraLong Covid Support, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9812-5183
Kiera McDuffDepartment of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0331-6919
Hannah WeiPatient-Led Research Collaborative, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0307-7498
Lisa McCorkellPatient-Led Research Collaborative, Oakland, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3261-6737
Catherine ThomsonLong COVID Physio, London, UK.
Mary KellyLong COVID Physio, London, UK.
Susie GouldingCOVID Long-Haulers Support Group Canada, Toronto, Canada.
Imelda O'DonovanLong COVID Advocacy, Ireland.
Sarah O'ConnellLong COVID Advocacy, Ireland.
Ruth StokesLong COVID Advocacy, Ireland.
Nisa MalliPatient-Led Research Collaborative, Toronto, Canada.
Natalie St Clair-SullivanDepartment of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1097-0759
Soo Chan CarusoneDepartment of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3977-0523
Angela M CheungInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8332-0744
Kristine M ErlandsonDeptartment of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0808-6729
Ciaran BannanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9288-8574
Liam TownsendDepartment of Infectious Diseases, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7089-0665
Colm BerginDepartment of Infectious Diseases, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6651-1132
Jaime H VeraDepartment of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1165-0573
Richard HardingCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9653-8689
Lisa AveryBiostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8431-5143
Darren A BrownChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4956-243X
Kelly K O'BrienDepartment of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1632-6537

Funding

This study was funded by the Ontario Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) SUPPORT Unit, which is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Province of Ontario, and partner Ontario hospital foundations and institutes. The Long COVID and Episodic Disability Study was funded by the CIHR, Emerging COVID-19 Research Gaps and Priorities Funding Opportunity (Funding Research Number: GA4-177753). K.K.O. was supported by a Canada Research Chair in Episodic Disability and Rehabilitation from the Canada Research Chairs Program (CRC-2022-00510).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLong Covid and other infection-associated chronic condition communities have been integral in advocating for patient engagement in all stages of research, from design and conduct, and implementation, through to interpretation and knowledge translation; nevertheless, the process varies across research teams. In this paper, we (1) describe our process undertaking a community-engaged Long Covid research study; (2) evaluate our community-engaged approach, highlighting strengths and limitations with our process; and (3) identify recommendations for engaging in community-engaged patient-oriented research in Long Covid.

methodsGuided by the 4PI (Principles; Purpose; Presence; Process; Impact) Framework and Patient-Led Research Scorecards, we describe our community-engaged approach within the Long COVID and Episodic Disability Study, followed by an evaluation of our community engagement using a multistage consultation with members of the Long COVID and Episodic Disability Study team. We conducted an online group-based discussion among persons with lived experiences and administered a web-based Scorecard questionnaire rating the collaboration as it relates to four domains of patient burden, governance, integration into the research process, and organisation readiness to all members of the team, to assess strengths and limitations of our approach. Scores ranged from -2 (non-collaboration) to +2 (ideal collaboration).

resultsTen team members, five of whom were persons with lived experiences, completed the Scorecard questionnaire. Median Scorecard scores ranged from +1 to +2 for all domains. Five team members with lived experiences, representing four community support groups and organisations that participated in the community-engagement discussion. We describe the practices and principles that enabled meaningful community engagement, with the strengths and limitations of our approach embedded throughout.

conclusionOur community-engaged approach to the Long COVID and Episodic Disability Study enhanced the quality and relevance of the study to the community while highlighting areas to heighten meaningful engagement throughout. This study builds on foundational community-based research principles of patient-oriented research. Recommendations derived from our experiences may be used by other research teams conducting community-engaged patient-oriented research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The Long COVID and Episodic Disability Study is a community-engaged research study involving 25 members, including 12 persons living with long Covid, 13 researchers and 5 clinicians (categories are not mutually exclusive), referred to as the Full Team. Persons with lived experiences possessed a range of professional and personal experiences spanning research, clinical, policy and private sector/business contexts; team members wore multiple hats and perspectives which collectively strengthened the diversity of expertise, perspectives and insights to the team and process. Engagement of people with lived experiences with Long Covid ensured that the study was fully co-created with people living with Long Covid. During the development of the study proposal, community partners from organisations in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States, who were linked to larger networks of people living with Long Covid, were purposefully invited to join the study team. Several Long Covid community networks and organisations, represented by persons living with Long Covid, were involved in all stages of the research, including: COVID Long-Haulers Support Group Canada (S.G.); Long COVID Advocacy Ireland (I.O., S.O. and R.S.); Long COVID Ireland (N.R. and R.S.); Long COVID Physio (D.A.B. and C.T.); Long Covid Support UK (M.O.H.); and Patient-Led Research Collaborative (L.M., N.M. and H.W.). These representatives along with the Co-PIs (K.K.O. and D.A.B.) and co-ordinator (K.M.) comprised the Core Long COVID and Episodic Disability Community Collaborator Team (Core Team). Team members with lived experiences were provided yearly remuneration for their time and expertise dedicated to the study, either as an individual, or to the community organisation which they represented on the study according to their preference.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity ParticipationCOVID-19Persons with DisabilitiesHumansPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSARS-CoV-2community engagementepisodic disabilityLong Covidpatient and public engagementpost‐Covid condition

Identifiers

PMID40783949
PMCPMC12335852

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.