ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2025
Heterogeneity of false reactivity profiles of HIV assays while optimizing national HIV testing algorithms: Findings from a multi-country analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study highlights the importance of verifying HIV testing algorithms to reduce the risk of misdiagnoses caused by common false reactivity. Between 2020 and 2023, WHO supported 14 countries to assess rates of false reactivity and shared false reactivity across HIV rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) used in HIV testing services. The study involved 26,278 results from 22 different RDT products, with sample sizes ranging from 100 to 302 results per country. The number of RDT products assessed varied between 4 and 13 per country. False reactivity rates ranged from 0 % to 3.32 %, with one country reporting a high false reactivity rate of over 4 % for one RDT. Five countries have no shared false reactivity between RDTs, while the remaining eight countries shared false reactivity across one to six pairs of RDT products. These findings were used to inform national policy, with more than 90 % of countries introducing new RDT products into their HIV testing algorithm based on these results. The study concludes that rates of false reactivity and shared false reactivity between RDT products vary across countries. Therefore, conducting verification studies is crucial for updating national HIV testing algorithms and ensuring accurate diagnosis while also facilitating the market entry of new HIV testing products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.