Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40784196›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2025

Heterogeneity of false reactivity profiles of HIV assays while optimizing national HIV testing algorithms: Findings from a multi-country analysis.

Manfred Accrombessi, Cheryl Johnson, Alaleh Abadpour, Jean De Dieu Anoubissi, Joseph Fokam, Araz Chiloyan, Iryna Andrianova, Hamakwa Mantina, Agai Kherbino Akec, Fatou Ousmane Sall and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Manfred AccrombessiEpigreen, Paris, France.
Cheryl JohnsonWorld Health Organization, Global HIV Hepatitis, and STI Programmes, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alaleh AbadpourWorld Health Organization, Global HIV Hepatitis, and STI Programmes, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jean De Dieu AnoubissiCentral Technical Group, National AIDS Control Committee, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Joseph FokamCentral Technical Group, National AIDS Control Committee, Yaounde, Cameroon; Chantal BIYA International Reference Centre for HIV/AIDS Prevention and Management, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences of the University of Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Araz ChiloyanNational Center of Infectious Diseases, Ministry of Health, Republic of Armenia.
Iryna AndrianovaHIV/AIDS Reference Laboratory, Public Health Center, Ministry of Health, Ukraine.
Hamakwa MantinaMinistry of Health, Zambia.
Agai Kherbino AkecNational HIV/Hepatitis/STIs Program, Ministry of Health, South Sudan.
Fatou Ousmane SallInstitut National de Santé Publique, Ministry of Health, Mali.
Abdelaye KeitaInstitut National de Santé Publique, Ministry of Health, Mali.
Elizabeth TelanNational Reference Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Philippines.
Adoum Fouda AbderrazzackMinistry of Public Health/University of N'Djamena, Chad.
Chatté AdawayeMinistry of Public Health/University of N'Djamena, Chad.
Rose WafulaNational AIDS and STIs Control Program, Ministry of Health, Kenya.
Stephen Ayisi-AddoNational HIV and AIDS Control Program, Ministry of Health, Ghana.
Monkoe S LeqhekaLaboratory Services, Ministry of Health, Lesotho.
Jacob Lusekelo MwambetaDiagnostic Services, Ministry of Health, Tanzania.
Jeremie Muwonga MasidiNational HIV Control Program, University of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Dramane KaniaCentre Muraz, INSP, Burkina Faso.
Anita SandsWHO, Regulation and Prequalification Department, Switzerland.
Rachel BaggaleyWorld Health Organization, Global HIV Hepatitis, and STI Programmes, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jean-François EtardEpigreen, Paris, France.
Céline LastrucciWorld Health Organization, Global HIV Hepatitis, and STI Programmes, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: lastruccic@who.int.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study highlights the importance of verifying HIV testing algorithms to reduce the risk of misdiagnoses caused by common false reactivity. Between 2020 and 2023, WHO supported 14 countries to assess rates of false reactivity and shared false reactivity across HIV rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) used in HIV testing services. The study involved 26,278 results from 22 different RDT products, with sample sizes ranging from 100 to 302 results per country. The number of RDT products assessed varied between 4 and 13 per country. False reactivity rates ranged from 0 % to 3.32 %, with one country reporting a high false reactivity rate of over 4 % for one RDT. Five countries have no shared false reactivity between RDTs, while the remaining eight countries shared false reactivity across one to six pairs of RDT products. These findings were used to inform national policy, with more than 90 % of countries introducing new RDT products into their HIV testing algorithm based on these results. The study concludes that rates of false reactivity and shared false reactivity between RDT products vary across countries. Therefore, conducting verification studies is crucial for updating national HIV testing algorithms and ensuring accurate diagnosis while also facilitating the market entry of new HIV testing products.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHIV InfectionsHIV TestingFalse Positive ReactionsHumansReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificityReagent Kits, DiagnosticFalse positivityFalse reactivityHeterogeneityHIV RDTHIV testing strategies and algorithms

Identifiers

PMID40784196
PMCPMC12439682

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.