Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40784339›Full record

ArticleEuropean addiction research2025

Non-Prescribed Use of Opioid Agonist Medications and Associations with Non-Fatal Overdoses: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study across a Decade of Reduced Monitoring.

Anne Line Bretteville-Jensen, Linda Nesse

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European addiction research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anne Line Bretteville-JensenDepartment of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Drugs, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Linda NesseNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

<p>Introduction: Non-prescribed use of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) medications is a public health concern. This study analyzes the prevalence of non-prescribed use and non-fatal overdoses in Norway in 2013 and 2023, a period marked by an increasingly flexible OAT regimen, and examines associations between non-prescribed use and non-fatal overdoses.

methodsCross-sectional surveys with two convenience samples (n

resultsNon-prescribed use of OAT medications significantly declined from 39.4% in 2013 to 28.1% in 2023 (p < 0.001), as did frequency of use (p < 0.01). There was no change in non-fatal overdoses in the past month (8.2% in both years), though past-year non-fatal overdoses decreased (23.6% in 2013 vs. 15.9% in 2023, p = 0.001). Multinomial regression analyses showed no significant association between non-prescribed OAT use and increased risk of non-fatal overdoses. Instead, factors such as injecting drug use, frequent heroin use, stimulant use, younger age, and female sex were associated with non-fatal overdose risk.

conclusionEven with an increasingly flexible OAT regimen, non-prescribed use declined among street-recruited participants, and no corresponding increase in non-fatal overdoses was observed. These findings challenge the assumption that reduced monitoring in OAT is linked with higher rates of non-prescribed use and adverse outcomes, such as non-fatal overdoses, among individuals not in OAT. </p>.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineDrug OverdoseMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneNon-medical useOpioid dependenceOverdosesStreet-recruited individualsTreatment regimen

Identifiers

PMID40784339
PMCPMC12503675

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.