ArticleBMC biology2025
Environmental adaptations in metagenomes revealed by deep learning.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeep learning has emerged as a powerful tool in the analysis of biological data, including the analysis of large metagenome data. However, its application remains limited due to high computational costs, model complexity, and difficulty extracting biological insights from these artificial neural networks (ANNs). In this study, we applied a transfer learning approach using the ESM-2 protein structure prediction model and our own smaller ANN to classify proteins containing the domain of unknown function 3494 (DUF3494) by their source environments. DUF3494 is found in a diverse group of putative ice-binding and substrate-binding proteins across a range of environments in prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms. They present a compelling test case for exploring the balance between prediction accuracy and interpretability in sequence classification.
resultsOur ANN analysed 50,669 DUF3494 sequences from publicly available metagenomes, and successfully classified a large proportion of sequences by source environment (polar marine, glacier ice, frozen sediment, rock, subsurface). We identified environment-specific features that appear to drive classification. Our best-performing ANN was able to classify between 75.9 and 97.8% of sequences correctly. To enhance biological interpretability of these predictions, we compared this model with a genetic algorithm (GA), which, although it had lower predictive ability, provided transparent classification rules and predictors. Further in silico mutagenesis of key residues uncovered a vertically aligned column of amino acids on the b-face of the protein which was important for environmental differentiation, suggesting that both methods captured distinct evolutionary and ecological aspects of the sequences. Feature importance analysis identified that steric and electronic properties of the protein were associated with predictive ability.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the utility of deep learning for classification of diverse biological sequences and provide a framework for combining methods to improve model interpretability and ecological insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.