Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40785982›Full record

ReviewHemaSphere2025

Harnessing the immunotherapeutic potentials of gamma delta T cells against hematological malignancies.

Charles Agbuduwe, John Maher, John Anderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in HemaSphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charles AgbuduweCentre for Haematology Imperial College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4783-9853
John MaherSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences Kings College London London UK.
John AndersonZayed Centre for Research and The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health University College London London UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gamma delta (γδ) T cells, which constitute about 5%-10% of peripheral blood lymphocytes, play key roles in tumor immunosurveillance and are often enriched within epithelial tissues. They are unique in their Major Histocompatibility Complex-independent antigen recognition via the γδ T-cell receptor (TCR) as well as via innate receptors, making them ideal1 candidates for allogeneic "off-the-shelf" cell therapy products. In humans, two main structural subsets of γδ T cells-Vδ1 and Vδ2-have been defined, which differ in TCRδ chains, effector function, and tissue localizations. Vδ2 T cells constitute the majority of γδ T cells in peripheral blood and can be expanded with aminobisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid. In recent years, the potent antitumor functions of Vδ1 T cells have also been recognized, and new expansion protocols are being developed. Given the ample preclinical evidence of γδ T-cell efficacy against hematological malignancies, several γδ T-cell-based cell therapy products are currently in clinical development, and there has been an exponential increase in the number of adoptive γδ T-cell therapy clinical trials. This comprehensive review provides an overview of the rationale for γδ T-cell therapy, ongoing clinical trials, as well as the challenges and future role of γδ T-cell-based immune therapies in hematology.

Identifiers

PMID40785982
PMCPMC12331877

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.