ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
What are the best clinical management strategies for cardiomyopathy? an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to summarize and evaluate the quality of evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of different interventions for patients with cardiomyopathy, based on published meta-analyses through an umbrella review. Materials and Methods: The literature was searched via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers evaluated the methodological quality of the included articles using the AMSTAR score. In addition, according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), evidence of each outcome was evaluated and graded as "high," "moderate," "low," or "very low" quality for drawing conclusions. Additionally, each outcome was classified into four categories (classes I-IV and nonsignificant). Results: High-quality evidence suggested that for patients with cardiomyopathy, stem cell treatment could significantly improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular ejection volume, 6-min walk distance (6-MWD), and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification. High-quality evidence also suggested that for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), adding traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) such as Qili Qiangxin capsule (QQC), Shenmai injection (SMI), Zhigancao, and Shengmai to conventional Western medical treatment could significantly improve clinical effects, including LVEF, 6-MWD, and reductions in inflammatory indicators, left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and heart rate. In addition, high-quality evidence suggested that for patients with DCM, drugs such as atorvastatin, carvedilol, thyroid hormone, and L-carnitine could significantly improve LVEF and cardiac output and reduce C-reactive protein levels, systolic blood pressure, LVEDD, and left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes. Furthermore, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy could significantly reduce sudden cardiac death. Conclusion: High-quality evidence showed that cell therapy, atorvastatin, carvedilol, and thyroid hormone have significant improvement effects on the prognosis of cardiomyopathy. In addition, combining traditional Chinese medicines with conventional Western medicine therapy could significantly improve the effectiveness of conventional Western medicine therapy for cardiomyopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.