ReviewMedicine and pharmacy reports2025
Addressing immunization gaps in children with congenital heart disease - a narrative review.
Review in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevention of Respiratory Infections in Children with Congenital Heart Disease: Current Evidence and Clinical Strategies.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Vaccination status in children with congenital heart disease in Wuxi, China: Analysis of retrospective data.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaccination programs have had a pivotal part in the successful reduction of global morbidity and mortality of infectious diseases. Despite their undeniable success, vaccination rates among children with congenital heart disease (CHD) remain suboptimal. This article aims to address the challenges surrounding immunization in CHD patients and provide guidance for immunization practices within this population. Most experts advocate for adherence to standard immunization practices in CHD patients who are immunocompetent and in good health. Supplemental vaccinations against rotavirus, varicella, meningococcus, hepatitis A and influenza are recommended. RSV prophylaxis with palivizumab is advisable in patients with hemodynamically significant CHD during winter season. However, special considerations are warranted in specific situations, such as around cardiac surgery or in patients who are immunocompromised. Furthermore, adjustments to the vaccination schedule might be necessary for patients who require antithrombotic prophylaxis or blood transfusions. Lastly, special attention should be given to individuals at a high risk of decompensation after immunization, who might require close parental or medical monitoring for up to 72 hours post-vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.