ReviewClinical hematology international2025
Beyond Hypomethylating Agents: Novel Therapies and Targeted Approaches.
Review in Clinical hematology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Management of HMA-Related Myelosuppression During MDS Treatment in the Canadian Landscape.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Article
- Therapy of high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Molecular Profiling ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic diseases sharing ineffective hematopoiesis, cytopenias, and a high risk of evolution to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The current MDS classification systems, such as the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the WHO 2022 classification, have incorporated molecular and cytogenetic markers to improve the stratification of risk and guide therapy. However, treatment options for high-risk MDS (HR-MDS) remain limited, with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) providing only modest survival benefits. Emerging treatments such as immune checkpoint blockade and novel targeted therapies could further improve patient outcomes. While early excitement was significant, clinical trials of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) ipilimumab and durvalumab have produced no definitive results, highlighting the need for better patient selection and combination regimens. Emerging drugs luspatercept and imetelstat have been suggested for lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) by promoting transfusion independence and global hematologic response. In contrast, exploratory agents such as pevonedistat, magrolimab, and sabatolimab are under further investigation for HR-MDS. The future of MDS treatment currently addresses precision medicine, in which molecular characterization guides therapeutic options. Identification of predictive biomarkers for response to targeted therapies and immunotherapies is crucial to optimize patient outcomes. An integrated, patient-centered approach combining genomics, novel therapeutics, and immunomodulation is therefore essential to address the current needs in MDS management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.