ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Factors Influencing Adherence to Dietary Interventions Among Patients with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in China: A Qualitative Study Based on the COM-B Model.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a frequent complication during pregnancy, which can cause many adverse effects on mother and baby. Although existing literatures have found that patients with gestational diabetes can benefit from adhering to dietary interventions, many pregnant women exhibit low dietary intervention compliance, leading to unsatisfactory blood glucose control. The qualitative research study aimed to identify the influencing factors of dietary intervention compliance among pregnant women with GDM using the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior (COM-B) model. Methods: Pregnant women with gestational diabetes who received regular antenatal care were purposefully recruited from the obstetric clinic of a tertiary general hospital in Beijing, China. The face-to-face semi-structured interviews were used to collect data; Guided by the COM-B model, the directed content analysis was used to analyze data. Results: Nineteen women from a great variety of socio-demographic backgrounds participated in this study. The average age of the participants was 32.26±4.58 years, the average gestational age of them was 36.03±1.75 weeks. 73.69% of them have a bachelor's degree or above in education level, 68.42% of participants were primipara. 52.63% of them had a normal weight, 26.32% were obesity, 15.79% were overweight, only 5.26% were underweight. In total, more than 80% of participants had no history of GDM in prior pregnancy or a family history of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and 42.11% of participants received insulin treatment. Eight themes (6 barriers and 2 facilitators) were mapped onto the COM-B model representing influencing factors of dietary intervention compliance among GDM pregnant women. The facilitators included high trust in professional support and a positive perception of dietary management benefits. The barriers were lack of pregnancy nutritional knowledge, insufficient knowledge and skills in dietary management, limited support from family members, low disease risk perception, negative experiences with dietary interventions, and low self-efficacy in dietary management. The results will provide basis and reference for the development of diet intervention for pregnant women with gestational diabetes. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the importance for healthcare professionals to strengthen support and guidance of dietary behavior for patients with gestational diabetes in China. Additionally, our findings highlight the need for clinical healthcare professionals to take measures that strengthen the self-efficacy and involve family members in supporting dietary modifications in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.