ArticleMedical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal2025
Visual impairment and blindness in diabetic retinopathy.
Article in Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) and a leading cause of preventable visual impairment (VI) and blindness worldwide. The rising global prevalence of DM, particularly in low- and middle-income regions such as the Middle East, necessitates the collection of localized data on DR-related VI. Despite growing public health concerns, limited research has been conducted in the Gulf region, including Oman. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and severity of VI associated with DR and identify its key risk factors among patients with types I and II DM in Al Buraimi, Sultanate of Oman. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Buraimi Hospital and Polyclinic in Oman between June 2023 and January 2024. Medical records of patients with type I or II DM and a confirmed diagnosis of DR were reviewed. Best-corrected distance visual acuity was assessed using a Snellen chart, and fundus examinations were performed using both direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy for DR detection and staging. VI was classified according to the WHO criteria. Relevant demographic and clinical data, including age, duration of DM, and duration of DR, were extracted. Coexisting ocular conditions were also documented. Results: A total of 218 participants were included, with a mean age of 57.5 years; 52.3% (n = 114) were male and 47.7% (n = 104) female. Most participants had no VI (n = 131, 60.1%), whereas mild VI (n = 58, 26.6%) was the most frequent type of VI. A significant association was detected between DR severity and VI levels ( Conclusions: The frequency of VI among patients with DR was relatively high, and its severity was significantly associated with older age and longer DR duration. Blindness occurred only in more severe DR stages, reinforcing the value of early screening and immediate care in mitigating disease severity. These findings indicate the need to optimize resources for early DR management and to promote screening, even in diabetic individuals with normal vision, to prevent disease progression and reduce visual disability. Further community-based research is needed to achieve a robust, practical understanding of the preventable causes of VI, guide national eye health policies, and enhance long-term patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.