ArticleJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology2025
Minimizing Blood Loss in Bladder Cancer: Efficacy of Preoperative Embolization before Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor.
Article in Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To verify the efficacy of preoperative embolization in patients with bladder cancer at ≥T2 stage or a vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS) score of ≥3 who require transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Materials and Methods: Initially, 1707 patients diagnosed with bladder cancer were selected using CT and MRI between January 2018 and October 2023. After applying the inclusion criteria of ≥T2 stage, VI-RADS score ≥3, and having undergone TURBT, 128 patients were included (28 with and 100 without preoperative embolization). Propensity score matching (PSM) minimized selection bias. Differences in the preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) levels (Hb gap) between patients with and without preoperative embolization were analyzed. Results: During PSM, comparisons adjusted by propensity scores were conducted using data from 28 patients per group (without preoperative embolization: 24 men and 4 women; mean age: 81.0 years; pathological stage: T1 [60.7%], T2 [39.3%]; with preoperative embolization: 25 men and 3 women; mean age: 81.0 years; pathological stage: T1 [53.6%], T2 [42.9%], T3 [3.6%]). An independent samples Conclusion: Preoperative embolization was beneficial for postoperative Hb level management in patients at ≥T2 stage and with a VI-RADS score ≥3 on CT and MR images. The ease, safety, and simplicity of preoperative embolization under local anesthesia make this procedure an option for patients at a high bleeding risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.