Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40787945›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2025

Engineering Extracellular Microenvironments: The Impact of Fibrous Materials on Cell Behavior.

Zan Lamberger, Gregor Lang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zan LambergerDepartment of Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9814-5173
Gregor LangDepartment of Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9819-8630

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 326998133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of tissue models and replacements that closely mimic native biological structures is a central goal in tissue engineering and biofabrication. These models aim to reduce animal testing and improve the relevance and translatability of experimental results. A key step is the transition from simple two-dimensional cultures to three-dimensional systems that better reflect the architecture of the extracellular matrix. Replicating the hierarchical organization of native tissues is essential, particularly the fibrous networks mainly composed of collagen, which regulate cell alignment, migration, proliferation, and differentiation. Incorporating such structures has proven highly effective and often necessary to induce cell behaviors resembling those in vivo. This review first examines the cellular mechanisms that govern interactions with fibrous microenvironments. It then outlines key design parameters for fiber-based substrates, including chemical composition, diameter, surface topography, and alignment. These factors can be tuned to guide cell organization and function. Strategies for translating these principles into three-dimensional fiber-reinforced constructs and bioinks are then discussed, with a focus on current approaches for creating biomimetic environments. The article concludes with future perspectives, highlighting the potential of fibrous scaffolds and advanced fabrication techniques to enable next-generation tissue models and regenerative therapies.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCellular MicroenvironmentExtracellular MatrixTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsHumansBiocompatible Materials3D modelsartificial matriceselectrospinningfibersmelt electrowriting

Identifiers

PMID40787945
PMCPMC12645087

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.