Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40789729›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Lay health worker-delivered and technology-based interventions for sexual and reproductive health among adolescents and young adults in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a scoping review.

Matthias Kern, Christine Neumann, Benjamin Bosompim, Dorit Ann, Adi Lukas Kurniawan, Nolwazi Dlamini, Sarah Nabukeera, Sphindile Machanyangwa, Dagmawit Tewahido, Sachin Shinde and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Matthias KernHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany matthias.kern@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4755-883X
Christine NeumannHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Benjamin BosompimHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Dorit AnnHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Adi Lukas KurniawanHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-1953
Nolwazi DlaminiPopulation Policy Promotion Unit, Department of Social Development (KZN), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Sarah NabukeeraSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Sphindile MachanyangwaSchool of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Dagmawit TewahidoNutrition and Behavioral Sciences Department, Addis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Sachin ShindeDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
DASH Collaborators
Justine BukenyaSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents and young adults (AYAs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are at high risk of harmful sexual and reproductive health (SRH) practices due to limited knowledge, low availability or acceptability of modern contraceptives, gender inequality and cultural practices like child marriage. Preventive and educational interventions by lay health workers or through technological means are a cost-effective and scalable solution. Unfortunately, too little is currently known about the scope, content and conditions of the effectiveness and sustainability of these approaches and synthetic evidence on this topic is scarce. To help fill this knowledge gap and to identify where further research is needed, we will conduct a scoping review of technology-based or lay health-worker delivered preventive and educational SRH interventions targeting AYAs in LMICs. This information is valuable to both policymakers and researchers as it provides a synthesis of existing interventions, highlights best practices for their implementation and identifies potential avenues for future research.

methodsThis review will include studies on SRH preventive and educational interventions targeting AYAs aged 10-24 years in LMICs. It encompasses interventions delivered by lay health workers or via technological means, assessing various outcomes including but not limited to SRH literacy, sexual risk behaviours, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections and gender-based violence. Key databases, including PubMed via ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The scope of this scoping review is limited to publicly accessible databases that do not require prior ethical approval for access. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, as well as presentations at national and international conferences and stakeholder meetings in LMICs. SCOPING REVIEW REGISTRATION: The final protocol is prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework on 7 May 2024 (osf.io/vna2z).

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersReproductive HealthSexual HealthAdolescentChildDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansMaleResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicYoung AdultAdolescentHealth EducationREPRODUCTIVE MEDICINESEXUAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID40789729
PMCPMC12352202

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.