ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
Risk of disease progression after discontinuing immunotherapy in 105 patients with Merkel cell carcinoma who responded to PD-1 pathway blockade.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Merkel cell carcinoma immunotherapy: key questions in the era of immune checkpoint blockade.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
- Long-term immune checkpoint inhibition therapy for advanced stage Merkel cell carcinoma.JAAD case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the preferred systemic therapy for most patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). However, the optimal duration of treatment for patients responding to ICI is unclear. Emerging data from retrospective analyses indicate a higher risk of MCC progression after ICI discontinuation, as compared with continuing ICI.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the rate of progressive disease (PD) after treatment discontinuation in patients with advanced MCC who experienced objective responses to first-line ICI. We evaluated whether the risk of PD was associated with the reason for treatment discontinuation (elective vs due to toxicity) and depth of response (complete vs partial response (CR vs PR)).
resultsAmong 105 responders, 58 discontinued ICI (median treatment duration: 12 months), and 47 continued ICI (median treatment duration: 20 months) at data cut-off. With a median follow-up of 34 months from ICI initiation, 33% of the entire cohort experienced disease progression at 2 years. 2 years after ICI initiation, 39% of patients who discontinued ICI had disease progression, compared with 14% of patients who continued ICI (HR=2.34 (95% CI: 1.07 to 5.12), p=0.034). Among patients who discontinued ICI, those with PR had a numerically higher rate of progression compared with patients with CR at 2 years after ICI discontinuation (56% vs 29%, respectively; HR=1.74 (95% CI: 0.72 to 4.20), p=0.22). Patients who discontinued due to toxicity had numerically higher rates of progression at 2 years (N=28) compared with patients who discontinued electively (N=30) (45% vs 31%, respectively; HR=2.08 (95% CI: 0.79 to 5.46), p=0.14). Among responders who stayed on ICI and had not progressed by 1 year, those who electively discontinued ICI had a high chance of remaining progression-free at 2 years (89%), similar to those who continued ICI (96%, p=0.59).
conclusionsThis study highlights the high progression risk following ICI discontinuation in advanced MCC, especially among patients with non-CRs or those discontinuing early. While elective discontinuation may be appropriate after durable CRs (response≥1 year), greater caution is warranted in other settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.