ArticleScientific reports2025
In-cell NMR reveals the first direct observation of endogenous interaction between HIV Tat protein and Tat RNA aptamer in human cells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-cell NMR spectroscopy: advancements, applications, challenges, and future directions in structural biology.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Dual-targeting phytochemicals Ergosterol and Quercetagetin implicate steroid metabolism-associated pathways in lung and liver cancer models.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Structural Characterization of Protein-Nucleic Acid Complexes: An Overview of the Recent Innovation in the Analytic Methods.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Biophysical and transcriptomic characterization of LL-37-derived antimicrobial peptide targeting multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and ESKAPE pathogens.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA-protein interactions lie at the basis of numerous regulatory and functional cellular biological processes, including transcriptional control, RNA processing, nuclear export, and viral replication. Despite their fundamental biological significance, direct structural investigation of RNA-protein complexes in live human cells remains an unresolved problem due to resolution limits in spatial information, delivery of molecules, and real-time monitoring under native conditions. Existing studies rely on pre-existing in vitro complexes added to cells and therefore overlook important aspects of endogenous binding and localization. Here, we report the first in-cell nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) study of the de novo formation of an RNA-protein complex in living human cells. By using a model system involving the HIV-1 Tat protein and its high-affinity RNA aptamer, we expressed Tat endogenously in HeLa cells and introduced the aptamer by electroporation. Direct observation was made of native complex formation within the intracellular milieu. In-cell NMR spectra exhibited characteristic chemical shift perturbations and nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) signatures indicative of specific RNA-protein binding under physiological conditions. Comparison directly with in vitro spectra confirmed structural integrity and binding specificity in the intracellular environment. Remarkably, we obtained a partial NOE-based assignment of the RNA upon complexation with Tat in living cells-an unprecedented step towards cellular structural biology. Complementary confocal microscopy validated nuclear co-localization, enabling functionally relevant interaction. This work shows the first direct, real-time evidence for native RNA-protein complex assembly in human cells. It provides a new paradigm for probing RNA-mediated regulatory events in vivo and expands the horizon of therapeutic RNA design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.