ArticleNature communications2025
Mechanisms and interventions promoting healthy frontostriatal dynamics in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effects of exercise on obsessive-compulsive disorder and bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Temporal interference stimulation of the nucleus accumbens in obsessive-compulsive disorder.General psychiatry · 2026Article
- Reaction Time Variability and Electrophysiological Indices of Performance Monitoring in Youths With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Investigating the methodological foundation of lesion network mapping.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neuroimaging in lesioning therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: region-based and network analysis of preoperative outcome predictors and postoperative effects.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Changes in the frontostriatal system activity support individuals' perseverance in distressful thoughts and rigid, repetitive behaviours that define obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Converging evidence from preclinical and clinical work suggests that OCD maps onto a functional imbalance in the ventral and dorsal frontostriatal circuits. However, the neural mechanisms supporting these dysregulations remain elusive, their association with symptom severity is unclear, and therapeutic interventions are limited. To address these gaps, we combined neuroimaging and behavioural data from individuals with OCD and controls with computational modelling. We found that bidirectionally decreasing spontaneous neural coupling in the ventromedial circuit while concurrently increasing dorsolateral cortico-striatal coupling delivered the highest functional improvements in OCD. The analysis of longitudinal changes in obsessions and compulsions with respect to modelled neural interventions supported our predictions. By highlighting behaviourally meaningful neural mechanisms hidden from traditional neuroimaging analysis, this study advances knowledge on the neural basis of OCD and provides new therapeutic targets for obsessions and compulsions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.