ArticleScientific reports2025
Structure based in silico screening of natural Vitamin D analogs for targeted and safer treatment of resistant multiple sclerosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Blocking ASIP to Protect MC1R Signaling and Mitigate Melanoma Risk: An In Silico Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disorder that causes progressive neurological disability through demyelination of the central nervous system. Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to increased MS risk and activity, with adequate levels shown to modulate immune responses. However, many MS patients exhibit resistance to high-dose Vitamin D therapy, often due to impaired Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) activation, limiting its therapeutic effectiveness and increasing the risk of side effects. This study explores the potential of natural Vitamin D analogs as safer and more effective alternatives for MS patients unresponsive to standard therapy. A ligand library of 317 Vitamin D analogs was curated using structure-based research from Pharmit and PubChem, emphasizing structural similarity to Vitamin D. Molecular docking was conducted to assess binding affinity to the VDR, followed by ADMET profiling to evaluate pharmacokinetic properties. Standard therapies for MS, such as interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate, are limited by incomplete responses and side effects. Complex 3 (BCP23832; CID 134692690) and Complex 5 (163217-09-2; CID 131954606) demonstrated the highest binding affinities to the VDR, with docking scores of - 12.2 kcal/mol and - 12.1 kcal/mol and corresponding inhibition constants (Ki) of 1.13 nM and 1.33 nM, respectively, showed high binding affinity, favorable gastrointestinal absorption, and the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. These compounds were further analyzed via 200 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, which demonstrated strong and stable interactions with key VDR residues, such as ALA135 and HIS137. Both analogs formed consistent hydrogen bonds, exhibited low Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) values, minimal Root Mean Square Fluctuation (RMSF), and stable Solvent Accessible Surface Area (SASA), indicating robust ligand-receptor binding. Overall, these findings highlight Complex 3 and Complex 5 as promising natural Vitamin D analogs with potential to overcome limitations of high-dose Vitamin D therapy in MS. While computational results are encouraging, further experimental validation is essential to confirm their safety, efficacy, and therapeutic value in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.