Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790185›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Coverage of continuum of Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) care in a nationally representative sample of 40,687 mother-child dyads of India: a report from NFHS-5.

Jyoti Ghosal, Anita Nanda, Pallavi Behera, Meena Som, Madhusmita Bal, Manoranjan Ranjit, Srikanta Kanungo, Shridhar Murlidharrao Kadam, Sanghamitra Pati, Ambarish Dutta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jyoti Ghosal *School of Public Health, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Anita Nanda *Harsha Trust, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Pallavi Behera *Indian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Meena SomPublic Health Professional, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Madhusmita BalICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Manoranjan RanjitICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Srikanta KanungoICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Shridhar Murlidharrao KadamIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Sanghamitra PatiICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. drsanghamitra12@gmail.com.
Ambarish DuttaIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. ambarish.dutta@iiphb.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA package of Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) services are administered sequentially to mother-child dyads as Continuum of Care (CoC), but often each intervention is reviewed in silo in low-middle-income countries like India. Therefore, we aimed to examine the coverage of the entire package by computing composite CoC score of Indian mother-child dyads. We also aimed to estimate the effect of Indian states on CoC after adjusting for variations in socio-economic determinants; and then rank the Indian states based on their adjusted effects.

methodsWomen (15-49 years) with most recently-born child (in last 5 years) aged 12-23 months (n = 40,687) from National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-21) of India were analysed. Nineteen CoC interventions (Y/N) were added (equally-weighted) to construct a composite CoC score. Multi-level models were used to study the state effect on CoC score after adjusting for individual-level wealth, education, caste, urban/rural residence and fertility. Indian states were ranked by their CoC performance using adjusted state residuals from the model.

resultsOnly 3% dyads received all the 19 interventions, however, 50% received 14/19. Sterile delivery kit usage (94.4%), newborn weighing (92.4%) and skilled birth attendance (89.4%) were services with higher coverage, whereas early initiation of breastfeeding (43.7%) and appropriate iron-folate consumption (56.8%) had low coverage. The state factor explained 23% CoC score. Odisha, a comparatively less-developed state, was ranked first and also other less-developed states like Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh outperformed richer counterparts. But many traditionally weaker Northern and North-Eastern states continued to lag behind.

conclusionOdisha and a few other less-developed Indian states demonstrated that good CoC coverage can be achieved even with restricted resources, perhaps through strengthening of public health system. Other states should emulate and help India as a nation achieve full CoC coverage of all its mother-child dyads and attain MNCH-related sustainable development goals.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesContinuity of Patient CareMaternal-Child Health ServicesMaternal Health ServicesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedPregnancyYoung AdultChild healthContinuum of careIndiaMaternal healthNewborn health

Identifiers

PMID40790185
PMCPMC12337437

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.