ArticleBiology of sex differences2025
Sex-based associations between neighborhood disadvantage and brain-gut alterations in individuals with irritable bowel syndrome.
Article in Biology of sex differences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social determinants of health and sex differences: insights from NIH Specialized Centers of Research Excellence (SCORE).Biology of sex differences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a stress-sensitive disorder that exhibits sex differences in brain-gut-microbiome interactions. Neighborhood disadvantage is a chronic stressor that may influence brain-gut-microbiome health in patients with IBS, potentially contributing to clinical profiles in a sex-specific manner. This study evaluated sex-based associations between neighborhood disadvantage and clinical characteristics, cortical morphology, and Prevotella relative abundance (a sex-specific microbial marker in IBS) in individuals with IBS compared to healthy controls (HCs).
methodsBrain magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained in 182 individuals with IBS (age, 31.0 ± 0.8 years; 128 females) and 161 HCs (age, 32.7 ± 1.0 years; 94 females). Fecal microbiome data was available in 113 IBS participants (80 females) and 127 HCs (74 females). Current neighborhood disadvantage was assessed as the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), with ADI⩾5 defined as high ADI. Group differences in the associations of high ADI with symptoms, Prevotella, and cortical morphology were evaluated using partial least squares.
resultsDiagnosis Differences: High ADI was associated with greater lateral intraparietal surface area in IBS vs HCs. Sex Differences: There were greater negative associations between high ADI and surface area in frontal operculum and thickness in frontopolar and primary somatosensory regions in females vs males. Diagnosis*Sex Differences: There were greater negative associations between high ADI and surface area in superior parietal and sensorimotor regions in IBS females vs males, and greater negative associations between high ADI and surface area and thickness in dorsolateral prefrontal and parietal regions, respectively, in IBS males vs females. High ADI was associated with greater symptom severity in IBS males, greater perceived stress in both IBS and HC females, and Prevotella relative abundance in IBS females (all p's < 0.01).
conclusionsNeighborhood disadvantage is associated with greater symptom severity in IBS males and both higher perceived stress (exacerbates symptoms) and Prevotella abundance (protective) in IBS females. It generally has a greater negative impact on emotion/pain-related cortical morphology in females vs males. However, there are more prominent somatosensory reductions in IBS females, and prefrontal reductions in IBS males. These findings highlight the interplay between social and biological factors in IBS and underscore the need for targeted, sex-specific interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.