Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790549›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2025

Multidrug-resistant E. Coli in wastewater sources: a comparative study and identification of resistance hotspots.

Reham R Abdelgalel, Reham Ali Ibrahem, Doaa Safwat Mohamed, Abo Bakr F Ahmed

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Widespread Distribution of Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Reham R AbdelgalelDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Reham Ali IbrahemDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt. reham.ali@mu.edu.eg.
Doaa Safwat MohamedDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sohag University, Sohag AlGadIda City, Egypt.
Abo Bakr F AhmedDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis work aims to study the patterns of resistance to antibiotics in wastewater samples collected from hospitals, the community, and the wastewater treatment plant using the indicator bacterium Escherichia coli. In addition, studying the phylogenetic type and screening for beta-lactamase-producing and diarrhoeagenic E. coli.

methodsThe isolates were subjected to antibiotic sensitivity tests using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method using 11 antibiotics. Conventional PCR was performed for the detection of E. coli that produces beta-lactamase, as well as for the phylogenetic typing of isolates and to detect diarrheagenic strains.

resultsFrom 120 wastewater samples, 92 E. coli strains were recovered and among them 66.3% were resistant. The highest resistance of isolates was observed in ampicillin/sulbactam with a moderately high rate of 37%, while the lowest resistance was reported in gentamycin at a low rate of 3.3%. Hospital wastewater isolates (HW) (75%) were more resistant than community wastewater isolates (CW) (50%). A high rate of resistance was reported in tetracycline (46.9%) among the hospital wastewater isolates, while a moderate rate of resistance was detected among community wastewater isolates to aztreonam (22.2%), making them the least effective antibiotics in these groups. More resistant isolates were found in WWTP influent (83.3%) than in effluent (44.4%). However, effluent isolates showed higher resistance to certain antibiotics, including cefepime (11.1% vs. 8.3%), piperacillin/tazobactam (11.1% vs. 4.2%), and imipenem (5.6% vs. 4.2%), than the influent. E. coli strains that showed MDR phenotype were 42.6% of resistant strains, with higher prevalence among HW (50%) and WWTPs influent (45%) than WWTPs effluent (37.5%) and CW (22.2%). Although resistance to Access antibiotics was the highest across all sources, it was comparable to the resistance observed for Watch antibiotics. At least one of the tested beta-lactamase genes was detected in 67.39% of beta-lactam-resistant E. coli strains, with bla

conclusionEven though resistance was less in community wastewater than hospital wastewater, community outlets might be a source of spreading resistance. Furthermore, wastewater treatment might not be enough to eliminate resistant bacteria from the effluent; as a result, the effluent quality should be continuously monitored and evaluated.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEscherichia coliWastewaterbeta-LactamasesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhylogenyAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesWastewaterBeta lactamasesDiarrheagenic E. coliPhylogenetic typingWastewater

Identifiers

PMID40790549
PMCPMC12341253

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.