ArticleBiology of sex differences2025
A comprehensive mixed-methods analysis of women's cardiovascular health needs in Georgia, United States.
Article in Biology of sex differences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social determinants of health and sex differences: insights from NIH Specialized Centers of Research Excellence (SCORE).Biology of sex differences · 2026Article
- Factors influencing residents' willingness to choose medical institutions first for treatment in the highland agricultural and pastoral areas of Qinghai province: a study based on the Anderson model.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsIn the United States, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death among both men and women; CVD and associated risk factors particularly affect women who live in rural areas. This mixed-methods analysis aims to explore cardiovascular health (CVH) risk factors and healthcare experiences among women in rural Georgia, to identify barriers to care, and to inform strategies for improving long-term health outcomes in rural communities.
methodsA convergent mixed methods design was utilized to evaluate CVH prevalence and associated environmental risk factors among women living in rural GA. Quantitative data from 159 Georgia counties were analyzed to compare rural and urban rates of CVD-related conditions and healthcare provider availability. Comparative analyses were performed between counties, urban and rural areas, and on sex differences. Concurrently, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 56 women and 11 healthcare providers to explore knowledge of blood pressure (BP) management, access to preventive services, and barriers to care. Qualitative and quantitative findings were analyzed separately and integrated during interpretation.
resultsRural counties have significantly higher prevalence of hypertension, obesity and stroke. General trends revealed higher rates of smoking, physical inactivity, and excessive alcohol consumption in rural counties compared to rates in urban counties of GA. Qualitative themes revealed affordability concerns, communication challenges between patients and providers, limited trust in telehealth, and the importance of delivering CVH education in community-based settings. Differences by age were also observed: younger women expressed less concern or awareness about CVH risks, while older women described greater engagement with care and health information. While the original aim included gaps in awareness and education, participants primarily described navigating systemic barriers across the care continuum.
conclusionRural women face individual, provider, and structural barriers to cardiovascular health and care. This unique study identifies chronic disease disparities and risk factors, with a higher disease burden observed in rural counties. Contributing factors may include limited resources for promoting healthy lifestyle choices, and reduced access to healthcare providers. Integrated findings underscore the need for sex- and gender- informed, age-specific, and community tailored strategies that address both health system access, and communication to improve CVH outcomes in underserved rural populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.