Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790785›Full record

ReviewPublic health nutrition2025

Analysis of food policymaking through a food systems lens: a review of analytical frameworks.

Isobel Stanley, Celine Murrin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Isobel StanleySchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2962-299X
Celine MurrinSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9728-9781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis paper aims to summarise the frameworks currently used to analyse food policymaking processes and to critically assess whether those frameworks can be applied to the analysis of integrated, 'systems' approaches to policymaking.

designTwo electronic databases were searched to identify publications analysing food policymaking processes. Data from the publications were charted using an iterative coding process, and details of the underlying analytical frameworks were recorded. Identified frameworks were evaluated using theories of systems approaches to food policy development.

settingGovernmental food policy at the supranational, national and local levels.

resultsThe search process yielded 532 results. After screening, a final forty-three publications and twenty-four frameworks were identified. In the studies, frameworks were used to analyse agenda-setting, stakeholder networks, policy coherence and development of national food and nutrition policies. All twenty-four frameworks allowed for analysis of actors and context in policymaking processes, while space for considering policy coherence featured less (

conclusionsThree frameworks were highlighted as particularly applicable to the context of food systems approaches to policymaking. The application of analytical frameworks for policymaking processes is limited in food policy research. However, this review demonstrates that there are considerable benefits to using such frameworks to understand the ideas, knowledge, power and decision-making that lead to food policy development. This is particularly useful in understanding the complex stakeholder networks and policy coherence necessary for successful policies for sustainable food systems.

Indexed as

Food SupplyNutrition PolicyPolicy MakingDecision MakingHumansFood policyFood systemsPolicymaking processesSustainability

Identifiers

PMID40790785
PMCPMC12516611

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.