ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Latent profiles of post-traumatic growth in patients with recent hysterectomy: psychosocial predictors and stigma-associated outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Studies have found that post-traumatic growth exists in patients with recent hysterectomy. However, previous studies have overlooked heterogeneity within groups. There is a lack of research on whether there are different categories of post-traumatic growth levels in patients with recent hysterectomy. Therefore, this study explores different categories of post-traumatic growth and their influencing factors in patients with recent hysterectomy based on latent profile analysis. It also analyses the relationship between stigma and different profiles of post-traumatic growth in patients. Methods: This study, which used convenience sampling to select patients who underwent hysterectomy at the gynaecology department of a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, was conducted from February to September 2024. The study included 210 patients aged 18 years or over who had undergone a hysterectomy and had agreed to participate in the questionnaire survey. A total of 210 questionnaires were distributed and 202 valid responses were received. The study used the following scales: a general information questionnaire (covering patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics); post-traumatic growth inventory-Chinese version (C-PTGI); and social impact scale (SIS). The C-PTGI primarily measures the level of posttraumatic growth in patients with recent hysterectomy; higher total scores indicate greater posttraumatic growth. The SIS assesses the level of stigma experienced by patients with recent hysterectomy, with higher scores indicating a greater degree of stigma. The data were analysed using SPSS 25.0 and Mplus 8.3. Results: Post-traumatic growth in patients with recent hysterectomy consisted of 3 types: negative growth group (18%), low-transformation-moderate growth group (53%), and positive growth group (29%). Significant differences in post-traumatic growth and scores on each dimension were found in different subgroups ( Conclusion: Heterogeneity exists in the post-traumatic growth level of patients with recent hysterectomy. Younger patients with higher levels of education and lower scores on the SIS tend to experience better post-traumatic growth after hysterectomy. Healthcare professionals should adopt more flexible and targeted interventions to help patients enhance their post-traumatic growth levels under the premise of correctly identifying the characteristics of different potential categories. This can better improve the mental health status of patients, promote their postoperative recovery, and enhance their quality of life and satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.