ArticleBMJ public health2025
Cross-cultural insights into non-communicable disease perceptions: a five-nation survey.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevention in stroke - Current state, present gaps and probable next steps.Neurological research and practice · 2026Review
- Health Education and Its Role in the Prevention and Management of Non-communicable Diseases: A Review.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) pose a significant global health challenge, with varying perceptions and attitudes influencing public health responses and policy development. This study aims to elucidate the cross-cultural perceptions and attitudes towards NCDs across five diverse countries, providing insights into global public health strategies. Methods: We analysed data from the 'Measuring Public Perceptions of Noncommunicable Diseases' survey, developed by Gallup and conducted in Colombia, India, Jordan, Tanzania and the USA. The survey encompassed questions on the perceived harmfulness of NCDs, empowerment for risk reduction and the influence of various entities on health. Statistical analysis included bivariate and multiple logistic regression models to assess the impact of socio-demographic factors on these perceptions. Findings: The study revealed significant cross-country variations in the perception of NCDs' harmfulness and the public's empowerment to reduce their risk. High-income and education levels were consistently associated with a greater perception of NCD harmfulness and empowerment across the surveyed nations. Notably, the USA exhibited a paradoxical trend of high empowerment and knowledge levels about NCDs, but low support for health policies like increased taxes on sugary beverages and alcohol. The proportion of participants from India and Jordan who manifested they could take actions to modify their risk of NCDs was remarkably low. Tanzanian and Jordanian respondents, especially female, showed lower empowerment levels, highlighting cultural and socioeconomic disparities in health literacy and policy support. Interpretation: These findings underscore the complexity of addressing NCDs globally and point to the need for culturally and socioeconomically tailored public health interventions. Understanding local perceptions and attitudes is crucial for designing effective health literacy programmes and policies to mitigate NCD risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.