Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791600›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

The Role of SR-BI in sepsis: leveraging mechanistic insights to advance precision steroid therapy.

Ling Guo, Qian Wang, Xiang-An Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ling GuoSaha Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Qian WangSaha Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Xiang-An LiSaha Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.

Funding

Relative adrenal insufficiency as a risk factor and an endotype for sepsisR35GM141478 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LI, XIANG-AN · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
BLRD VA I01 BX006408NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, 50.3% of septic shock patients received steroid/glucocorticoid (GC) therapy. However, whether GC therapy is beneficial and who might benefit from it are hotly debated. Initial guidelines recommended GC therapy for septic patients with adrenal insufficiency, but this has since been retracted. Recent studies using animal models of adrenal insufficiency have shed light on the mechanisms, demonstrating that the adrenal stress response is a part of the host response that is essential for control inflammatory response in sepsis and the adrenal insufficiency is a risk factor for sepsis. This perspective review explores the limitations of GC therapy through the lens of GC biology, with a particular focus on the role of scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) in mediating the adrenal stress response. We highlight the mechanisms of how SR-BI-mediated adrenal stress response contributes to the regulation of hyperinflammation and innate immune responses. By integrating mechanistic insights with the limitations of GC therapy, we advocate for a precision medicine approach to GC therapy in sepsis- selectively applying GC therapy for patients with adrenal insufficiency, not without.

Indexed as

GlucocorticoidsSepsisAdrenal InsufficiencyAnimalsHumansPrecision MedicineGlucocorticoidsadrenal stress responseglucocorticoidprecision medicinescavenger receptor BIsepsis

Identifiers

PMID40791600
PMCPMC12336133

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.