ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2025
Exploration of serum biomarkers in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fractions through analysis of heterogeneity.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarkers in Clinical Medicine Research: A Literature Survey in the PubMed Database and a Critical Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Metabolomic Biomarkers in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance.Cureus · 2025Review
- Heart Failure Biomarkers-Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Prognosis and Clinical Relevance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) differ markedly in their pathophysiology. Distinguishing HFpEF remains challenging, particularly among patients with hypertension and metabolic syndrome. Methods: Untargeted metabolomics using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was performed on serum samples from four groups: healthy controls (N), hypertensive patients with diabetes (H_A_T), HFpEF, and HFrEF. Key metabolites distinguishing HFpEF were identified using pathway enrichment analysis and random forest machine learning. ROC curve analysis evaluated their diagnostic accuracy. Results: A total of 3924 metabolites were identified. Amino acid and fatty acid metabolic pathways emerged as central to heart failure pathophysiology. Metabolites including DG(13:0/20:3(8Z,11Z,14Z)/0:0), glutarylcarnitine, homo-l-arginine, sphingosine, and (R)-3-hydroxybutyrylcarnitine were highlighted as diagnostic markers. A predictive model based on these metabolites effectively distinguished HFpEF from other subtypes, with enhanced specificity when combined with NT-proBNP. Conclusions: The identified serum metabolites show promise as early diagnostic biomarkers for HFpEF. Validation in larger, multicenter cohorts and further investigation into underlying biological mechanisms are necessary to confirm their clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.