ReviewObesity science & practice2025
Integrative Strategies in Primary Care: Addressing Recurrent Weight Gain Post-Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.
Review in Obesity science & practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Micronutrient Deficiencies in Obese Patients and Risk of Postoperative Fistula: A Forgotten Link in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Primary Care Providers Perspectives of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists to Manage Recurrent Weight Gain after Metabolic Bariatric Surgery - a Qualitative Study.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective and durable approach to treating obesity, yet recurrent weight gain occurs in a subset of patients. Primary care often serves as a routine point of contact for patients following MBS and is a potential gateway for addressing and/or preventing recurrent weight gain. Methods: Although guidelines for the management of recurrent weight gain after MBS exist, this narrative review was undertaken to clarify the role of the primary care providers in enhancing long-term outcomes and preventing weight gain after MBS. Findings: Regular follow-up in primary care provides an opportunity to identify challenges related to weight management and overall health outcomes, which may include concerns related to nutrition, mental or physical well-being, body image, motivation, and behavior change, for example. The availability of multidisciplinary providers within primary care settings, including behavioral health specialists, dietitians, and physical therapists, is an important strength of this setting in addressing potential post-MBS concerns such as recurrent weight gain. Conclusion: This review outlines clinical considerations for managing recurrent weight gain post-MBS in primary care and includes recommendations for both primary care providers and specialty clinicians working in primary care to deliver care effectively and mitigate weight stigma post-MBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.