ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
The incidence, risk factors, and survival of acute myeloid leukemia secondary to chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a population-based study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a heterogeneous myeloid malignancy, characterized by sustained peripheral blood monocytosis and an inherent risk of secondary acute myeloid leukemia (s-AML). This study aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, and survival of AML secondary to CMML. Methods: We conducted this retrospective analysis based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results: We identified 3,218 patients with primary CMML. After a median follow-up time of 23 months, 291 patients developed s-AML and most of them occurred in the first year of CMML diagnosis, with cumulative incidence of 10.8%. In competing risk analysis, risk factors for s-AML were younger age and exposure to chemotherapy at CMML diagnosis. The post-progression survival (PPS) of s-AML was dismal with a median survival of 4 months (1-, 3-, and 5-year PPS of 26.6%, 9.6%, and 7.1%, respectively), while younger age and exposure to chemotherapy at s-AML development were protective factors for PPS. Considering CMML, s-AML development, older age, and exposure to chemotherapy at CMML diagnosis were risk factors for overall survival (OS). In addition, being married, higher income, and non-Hispanic White were important protective factors for OS of CMML. Conclusions: The risk of s-AML among CMML was high and the PPS was poor. Age and exposure to chemotherapy at CMML diagnosis were associated with the high risk of s-AML and the poor survival of s-AML. In addition to clinical factors, demographic factors, including marital status, economic level, and race/ethnicity, should also be included when assessing the CMML survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.