ReviewTranslational cancer research2025
Impact of smoking on the effectiveness of different non-small-cell lung cancer therapies.
Review in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concordance study of bronchial biopsy tissues and matched bronchial brushing cytology specimens in driver gene detection of non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Cancer Drug Development in Never-Smoker Lung Cancer: Targeted and Immune-Based Therapeutic Strategies.Oncology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Smoking reshapes tumor genetics, host immunity, and drug metabolism in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet its therapy-specific impact is often overlooked. This review sought to clarify how current, former, and never smokers respond to each major NSCLC modality and to outline opportunities for treatment optimization. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to April 2025 identified 146 high-quality trials, cohorts, and meta-analyses that reported outcomes by smoking status. Hazard ratios, response rates, and complication data, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed. Key Content and Findings: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors improved overall survival across all smoking groups (pooled HR_OS =0.74), although active smokers exhibited shorter response durability because of faster drug clearance and persistent immune dysfunction despite higher tumor-mutational burden and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Never-smokers achieved markedly better progression-free survival with EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors [hazard ratio (HR) 0.32 Conclusions: Smoking status is a potent, modifiable determinant of NSCLC outcomes. Embedding structured cessation programs, tailoring dose or schedule, and incorporating smoking-informed molecular profiling into routine care could heighten efficacy and reduce toxicity. Future trials should stratify participants by detailed tobacco history to advance truly personalized, behavior-integrated oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.