ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Development and validation of machine learning models for classifying cancer-related sarcopenia using Kinect-based mixed-reality exercises in breast cancer survivors.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The relationship between sarcopenia and breast cancer: mechanistic pathways and clinical relevance.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sarcopenia in cancer survivors is often underdiagnosed due to limited access to imaging-based diagnostic tools such as computed tomography (CT) or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Indirect classification using movement data may offer a practical, scalable alternative. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML)-based classification models for cancer-related sarcopenia using joint angle data obtained from Kinect-based mixed-reality (KMR) devices, aiming to improve classification accuracy and identify key movement-related predictors. Methods: Overall, 77 breast cancer survivors (mean age, 48.9±5.4 years) were included based on stage I-III diagnosis, treatment completion ≥6 months prior, no metastasis, low physical activity, and no major comorbidities. Sarcopenia was diagnosed using skeletal muscle index (SMI) (<5.7 kg/m Results: Of the 38 participants in the exercise group included in the final analysis, 12 (31.5%) were initially diagnosed with sarcopenia. After the 8-week KMR device exercise intervention, 3 participants showed recovery from sarcopenia, resulting in 9 (23.6%) remaining classified with the condition. In the test set, the XGB model demonstrated the highest performance, achieving 94.7% accuracy, 91.2% recall, 95.8% precision, 93.4% F1 score, and 96.2% area under the curve (AUC). Feature importance analysis using RF and XGB consistently identified right "knee flexion (right)" as the most influential predictor. Conclusions: Among ML classification models trained on KMR device joint data, XGB demonstrated the best performance. Right knee flexion emerged as the most influential feature in sarcopenia classification. These findings suggest that KMR device movement analysis may serve as a practical, non-invasive screening tool for sarcopenia, enabling early detection and personalized intervention strategies for breast cancer survivors in both clinical and remote settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.