Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40793916›Full record

ArticleMedical care2025

Perceived Health Misinformation on Social Media and Public Trust in Health Care.

Jim P Stimpson, Sungchul Park, Emily H Adhikari, David B Nelson, Alexander N Ortega

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jim P StimpsonDepartment of Health Economics, Systems, and Policy, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-1266-9436
Sungchul ParkDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Emily H AdhikariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
David B NelsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Alexander N OrtegaThompson School of Social Work and Public Health, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI.

Funding

Understanding Mis- and Disinformation About Health Care Access and Their Impacts on Decision-Making Among Latino ImmigrantsR01MD018727 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI Arturo Vargas Bustamante, Alexander N Ortega · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD018727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInvestigate the association between perceptions of health misinformation on social media and trust in the health care system among US adults, and to assess whether this association varies by frequency of health care visits, perceived health care quality and experiences of medical care discrimination.

methodsCross-sectional survey study using data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey 6 (HINTS 6). Analysis was conducted on data collected from March to November 2022. Participants included 3805 adults who reported using social media and had at least one health care visit in the past year. Survey-weighted, multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations.

resultsAmong those who reported high trust in the health care system, 65.1% perceived less than substantial health misinformation on social media, whereas 34.9% perceived substantial misinformation. In multivariable models, participants who perceived substantial health misinformation on social media had higher odds of reporting low trust in the health care system (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.11-2.48). This association between misinformation and trust varied by perceived health care quality and experiences of discrimination. Among those perceiving less than substantial misinformation, the probability of low trust was 11% (95% CI: 9-13) for individuals without medical care discrimination and 33% (95% CI: 20-45) for those reporting discrimination. The interactions between misinformation and health care visit frequency and quality were not statistically significant.

conclusionsPerceptions of substantial social media health misinformation were associated with lower trust in the US health care system, particularly among individuals reporting experiences of medical care discrimination.

Indexed as

CommunicationSocial MediaTrustAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adulthealth care discriminationhealth care qualityhealth care trusthealth misinformationHINTSsocial media

Identifiers

PMID40793916
PMCPMC12412888

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.