ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Targeting cuproptosis opens a new chapter of nanomedicine: a scientometric and graphical analysis.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cuproptosis, an emerging modality of regulated cell death triggered by intracellular copper accumulation, has recently garnered increasing scientific interest due to its therapeutic potential across a spectrum of pathological conditions. The convergence of this novel cell death mechanism with nanomedicine has catalyzed swift progress in designing therapeutic modalities, offering new avenues for precision-targeted interventions. Despite this progress, systematic evaluations of nanocuproptosis remain scarce. To address this gap, we conducted a scientometric analysis of research published between 2014 and 2024. The dataset utilized in this study was extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection and subsequently subjected to in-depth analysis using a suite of scientometric methodologies and visualization frameworks. The analytical outcomes underscore China's predominant influence within this research domain, contributing 78.04% of all publications and shaping the direction of research. Notable institutions include the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sichuan University, and Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Additionally, Liudmila Puchkova is identified as the most productive researcher, while Advanced Healthcare Materials emerges as the top journal publishing related studies. The analysis also reveals key disease areas associated with nanocuproptosis research, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, glioma, melanoma, pancreatic neoplasms, and triple-negative breast neoplasms. This comprehensive scientometric study provides valuable insights for both established and early-career researchers, facilitating rapid access to critical information and supporting further advances in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40794178What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.