Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794380›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences2025

The Future of Perceptual Dysregulation in Psychiatric Nosology.

Albert R Powers, Sahib S Khalsa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Albert R Powers *Psychiatry Department, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. albert.powers@yale.edu.
Sahib S Khalsa *Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA. skhalsa@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like other medical illnesses, psychiatric conditions are defined by the presence of characteristic signs and symptoms that cause distress and dysfunction. Unlike most medical illnesses, however, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying psychiatric symptoms remain largely unknown. Recent work in theory-driven computational neuroscience has proposed a unified account of how organisms derive estimates of both external and internal states by integrating prior beliefs with sensory input. This framework offers a powerful means of explaining typical perception and action, while also identifying how these processes may go awry to produce a panoply of psychiatric symptoms. Disruptions in this inferential process, which we term perceptual dysregulation, span exteroceptive, proprioceptive, and interoceptive systems and manifest across conditions ranging from psychosis and autism to anxiety and trauma-related disorders, functional neurological disorder, and dementia. This volume reviews emerging evidence for maladaptive sensory inference across psychiatric and neurological illness and explores how computational models based on Bayesian statistics can illuminate shared mechanisms beneath diverse symptom presentations. We argue that targeting perceptual dysregulation may not only enable new interventions but also catalyze the development of a revised psychiatric nosology grounded in testable models of brain-body interaction.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPerceptual DisordersHumansComputational PsychiatryInteroceptionPerceptual InferencePredictive CodingPsychiatric DisordersSensory Processing

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.