ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025
Risk of ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart failure in patients with systemic sclerosis: a population-based study.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk of heart failure in systemic sclerosis: is it more than just ischemic heart disease?Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the risk of incident ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart failure (HF) in a population-based cohort of all patients with SSc in Sweden compared with the general population.
methodsWe identified patients with incident SSc 2004-19 using nationwide Swedish registers and age- and sex-matched comparators from the general population (1:10). We started follow-up from the date of SSc diagnosis, the same date was assigned to the respective comparators. Our primary outcome was incident HF [International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD)-10: I50] as main diagnosis stratified into ischaemic and non-ischaemic HF depending on whether a visit listing ischaemic heart disease (ICD-10: I20-I25) was recorded before HF diagnosis or not. We used flexible parametric models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) over time since SSc diagnosis.
resultsThe study cohort comprised 1598 patients with SSc and 16 616 comparators. During follow-up, 101 (6%) patients with SSc developed HF compared with 378 (2%) of the comparators. Ischaemic HF represented 35% and non-ischaemic HF represented 65% of all HF cases in both groups. The relative risk of HF overall, ischaemic HF and non-ischaemic HF was highest soon after SSc diagnosis. HR at the end of the first year of follow-up was 5.7 (95% CI 4.2-7.9) for HF overall, 6.7 (95% CI 3.5-13.0) for ischaemic HF and 5.8 (95% CI 4.0-8.3) for non-ischaemic HF.
conclusionSSc is associated with both ischaemic and non-ischaemic HF, emphasizing the role of other mechanisms than ischaemia, such as myocyte dysfunction, myocardial fibrosis and microvascular impairment, in the development of HF in SSc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.