Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794913›Full record

Trial reportAge and ageing2025

Oestrogen replacement combined with resistance exercise in older women with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Tomohiro Mitoma, Hikaru Ooba, Kasumi Takahashi, Tsunemasa Kondo, Tomohiro Ikeda, Yoko Sakamoto, Toshiharu Mitsuhashi, Jota Maki

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Age and ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tomohiro MitomaMedical Development Field, Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8013-0718
Hikaru OobaMedical Development Field, Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8676-1892
Kasumi TakahashiObstetrics and Gynecology, Ochiai Hospital, Maniwa, Okayama, Japan.
Tsunemasa KondoObstetrics and Gynecology, Ochiai Hospital, Maniwa, Okayama, Japan.
Tomohiro IkedaRehabilitation Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5350-944X
Yoko SakamotoMedical Development Field, Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0009-0006-9908-6191
Toshiharu MitsuhashiMedical Development Field, Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9940-0570
Jota MakiMedical Development Field, Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4800-4249

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterventions targeting physical function decline in older women with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) are vital for healthy ageing. The additive benefits of combining oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) with resistance exercise remain unclear.

objectiveTo evaluate the additive effect of low-dose ERT on physical performance when combined with a muscle resistance exercise programme (MREP) in older women with KOA.

designThis is a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised clinical trial. SUBJECTS: The subjects were community-dwelling women aged ≥65 years with chronic knee pain and KOA diagnosis.

methodsParticipants completed a 3-month MREP and were randomised to receive daily low-dose transdermal ERT (oestradiol 0.54 mg/day) or placebo. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, postintervention and 12 months later. The primary outcome was change in 30-second chair stand test (CS-30) score. Secondary outcomes included muscle mass, knee extension strength, walking performance, metabolic indicators, knee pain scale and 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12). Between-group differences in CS-30 changes were analysed using a linear regression model based on the intention-to-treat principle.

resultsAmong 168 individuals screened, 75 participants (mean age 73.8 years, SD 5.8) were enrolled and randomised into an ERT group (n = 37) or a placebo group (n = 38). Baseline CS-30 scores were 14.81 (SD 3.95) in the ERT group and 15.58 (SD 3.48) in the placebo group. At 3 months, mean changes were 2.59 (SD 2.58) and 1.79 (SD 2.28) repetitions, respectively. The primary analysis showed no statistically significant between-group difference [regression coefficient: 0.81 (95% CI: -0.31, 1.92); P = .16]. Post hoc subgroup and sensitivity analyses suggested that benefits may exist among early-stage KOA participants. SF-12 mental health scores also improved significantly in the ERT group. No serious adverse events occurred.

conclusionsERT did not confer significant additive benefits to resistance exercise overall but may improve outcomes in early-stage KOA and mental health domains. These exploratory findings warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

EstradiolEstrogen Replacement TherapyKnee JointOsteoarthritis, KneeResistance TrainingAgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMuscle StrengthTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeEstradiolknee osteoarthritismuscle resistance exerciseoestrogen replacement therapyolder peoplephysical performancerandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID40794913
PMCPMC12342371

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.