ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026
Enhancing end-stage renal disease outcome prediction: a multisourced data-driven approach.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The roles of free-fatty acid receptors in the pathophysiology of renal disorders.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2026Review
- Gaps in artificial intelligence research for rural health in the United States: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning model based on routine metabolic laboratory indices to identify advanced chronic kidney disease.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of ARHGAP26 expression, prognostic significance, and immune infiltration in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Early prediction of CKD from time series data using adaptive PSO optimized echo state networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo improve prediction of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models applied to integrated clinical and claims data with varying observation windows, supported by explainable artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance interpretability and reduce bias. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe utilized data from 10 326 CKD patients, combining clinical and claims information from 2009 to 2018. After preprocessing, cohort identification, and feature engineering, we evaluated multiple statistical, ML and DL models using 5 distinct observation windows. Feature importance and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis were employed to understand key predictors. Models were tested for robustness, clinical relevance, misclassification patterns, and bias.
resultsIntegrated data models outperformed single data source models, with long short-term memory achieving the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) (0.93) and F1 score (0.65). A 24-month observation window optimally balanced early detection and prediction accuracy. The 2021 estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation improved prediction accuracy and reduced racial bias, particularly for African American patients. DISCUSSION: Improved prediction accuracy, interpretability, and bias mitigation strategies have the potential to enhance CKD management, support targeted interventions, and reduce health-care disparities.
conclusionThis study presents a robust framework for predicting ESRD outcomes, improving clinical decision-making through integrated multisourced data and advanced analytics. Future research will expand data integration and extend this framework to other chronic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.